Coaching Elite Female HYROX and Hybrid Athletes:
An Evidence-Informed Narrative Review

Abstract

Background: HYROX is a standardized indoor fitness race that alternates 8 x 1 km runs with eight functional workout stations. The format creates a distinctive hybrid demand profile in which endurance capacity, station efficiency, fatigue-resistant strength and pacing interact across approximately race-duration efforts.

Objective: This narrative review synthesizes evidence relevant to coaching elite female HYROX and hybrid athletes, with emphasis on race demands, concurrent training, female-athlete physiology, menstrual-cycle considerations, nutrition, relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs), pacing and research gaps.

Evidence acquisition: The review prioritizes peer-reviewed literature from sport science, endurance training, concurrent strength-endurance training, female athlete health and nutrition, together with official HYROX rulebook and race-format materials. Because HYROX-specific empirical research is emerging but still limited, recommendations are categorized as direct HYROX evidence, adjacent sport-science evidence or evidence-informed extrapolation.

Synthesis: The strongest current model is that elite female HYROX performance is constrained by aerobic capacity, running economy under pre-fatigue, fatigue-resistant force production, grip and trunk durability, station movement economy, fueling sufficiency and pacing discipline. Early HYROX-specific evidence suggests that running accounts for most total race time and that VO2max and endurance-training volume are associated with faster simulated performance, but available samples are small and not female-specific. Female-specific concurrent-training reviews support combined strength and endurance development, while broader evidence suggests explosive-force adaptations may be most vulnerable when endurance and strength work are compressed into the same session. Menstrual-cycle effects on performance appear small at the group level, supporting individualized monitoring rather than rigid phase-prescriptive programming.

Conclusions: A defensible coaching framework for elite female HYROX athletes should combine a robust aerobic base, targeted threshold and race-specific intervals, progressive heavy resistance training, station-specific efficiency, individualized menstrual and recovery tracking, sufficient carbohydrate and protein intake, and proactive REDs surveillance. Future research should use prospective female cohorts with official split data, laboratory profiling, menstrual and contraceptive-status reporting, nutrition monitoring and injury surveillance.

Keywords: HYROX; female athletes; hybrid training; concurrent training; endurance performance; menstrual cycle; sports nutrition; REDs

Abbreviations: CT, concurrent training; HIFT, high-intensity functional training; REDs, relative energy deficiency in sport; RPE, rating of perceived exertion; TID, training-intensity distribution; VO2max, maximal oxygen uptake.

Introduction

HYROX has become one of the most recognizable formats in hybrid fitness competition because it is standardized, repeatable and highly comparable across venues and seasons. In the current single-racer rulebook, the event consists of a 1 km run followed by one workout station, repeated eight times, for a total of 8 km of running and eight stations completed in a fixed order. The official race sequence includes SkiErg, sled push, sled pull, burpee broad jump, rowing, kettlebell farmers carry, sandbag lunges and wall balls, with division-specific loading and repetition standards (HYROX World GmbH, 2026).

This standardization makes HYROX unusually attractive for sport-science analysis. Unlike many high-intensity functional training events, where workouts vary between competitions, HYROX athletes face a consistent sequence of running and station demands. The fixed structure allows coaches and researchers to evaluate pacing, split degradation, transition skill, station-specific efficiency and training specificity over time. For elite female athletes, this creates a particularly valuable performance problem: the event rewards high aerobic capacity and running economy, but only when these qualities can be maintained after repeated bouts of sled work, jumping, rowing, carrying, lunging and wall-ball cycling.

The applied challenge is that HYROX is growing faster than the peer-reviewed literature that directly studies it. Until recently, most recommendations for HYROX coaching were extrapolated from adjacent domains such as endurance running, resistance training, CrossFit-style high-intensity functional training, concurrent training and female athlete health research. A 2025 simulated-competition study has begun to characterize acute HYROX demands, showing a running-dominant event profile with very high cardiovascular strain, elevated blood lactate and associations between faster completion time, higher VO2max, greater endurance-training volume and lower body-fat percentage (Brandt et al., 2025). However, the sample was small, recreational and only 27% female, so the study is best viewed as an important first step rather than a definitive performance model for elite women.

The female-athlete lens is essential. Coaches increasingly recognize the importance of menstrual health, energy availability, iron status, hormonal contraceptive use, recovery patterns and sex-specific research gaps. Yet current evidence does not support simplistic or deterministic rules such as universally lowering training intensity in a particular menstrual phase or treating female athletes as unable to tolerate demanding concurrent training. The more defensible approach is to preserve evidence-based principles of progressive overload, specificity, fueling and recovery while using individualized monitoring to detect athlete-specific patterns that deserve adjustment.

The purpose of this narrative review is therefore to translate current evidence into a publication-ready, research-grounded coaching framework for elite female HYROX and hybrid athletes. The review addresses two questions: first, which physiological, training, nutritional and health factors most plausibly influence elite female HYROX performance; and second, which recommendations are directly supported by HYROX-specific data versus extrapolated from adjacent sport-science evidence?

Race Format and Female Division Demands

Table 1 summarizes the current HYROX single-racer race sequence and the women and women pro loads most relevant to this review. The fixed order matters because each run begins after a distinct local fatigue stressor, and each station is performed after the athlete has accumulated additional running fatigue.

Table 1. HYROX single-racer race sequence and women-specific station demands

Note. Loads and distances are derived from the HYROX EN Single Rulebook 26/27. “Incl. sled” indicates the total sled load stated in the rulebook, including the sled. Local venue surfaces may alter sled feel and pacing response even when official loading is standardized.

Evidence Acquisition and Scope

This article is an evidence-informed narrative review rather than a systematic review or original empirical study. The aim is translational: to integrate the best currently available HYROX-specific evidence with adjacent sport-science evidence that can responsibly inform coaching practice for elite female HYROX and hybrid athletes.

Sources were prioritized in four tiers. Tier 1 included HYROX-specific peer-reviewed studies and official HYROX race-format materials. Tier 2 included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, consensus statements and position stands relevant to concurrent training, menstrual-cycle and performance research, training-intensity distribution, sports nutrition and REDs. Tier 3 included female-athlete narrative reviews and methodological papers that clarified research gaps. Tier 4 included applied coaching inference from the above evidence. Literature emphasis was placed on studies published from 2020 onward, while retaining older position stands and reviews when they remain widely cited and relevant.

Because this was not a systematic review, no pooled effect estimates were calculated and no PRISMA flow diagram is presented. Instead, claims are deliberately graded in the text as direct HYROX evidence, adjacent evidence or evidence-informed extrapolation. This conservative framing is important because the evidence base for HYROX is emerging, and many questions central to elite female performance - including race pacing, station-split determinants, injury epidemiology, menstrual status and nutrition strategies - remain under-studied in HYROX-specific cohorts.

Evidence Synthesis

HYROX as a Running-Focused Hybrid Event

The official format alone shows that HYROX is not simply a strength circuit with running inserted between stations. Every athlete completes 8 km of running, and the run intervals are distributed throughout the event rather than performed as a single continuous run. This creates a repeated problem of re-establishing stride rhythm after local fatigue from high-force, high-repetition or grip-dominant stations. From a coaching perspective, the event is best conceptualized as a running-focused hybrid endurance race with repeated local muscular constraints.

Brandt et al. (2025) provide the strongest direct HYROX evidence currently available. In a simulated Open Division HYROX involving 11 recreational athletes, completion time was 86.5 minutes, with accumulated running time of 51.2 minutes and accumulated station time of 32.8 minutes. Most of the event was performed at hard or very-hard cardiovascular intensities, and maximum blood lactate and RPE were higher during exercise stations than during runs. Faster completion was significantly associated with higher VO2max, greater endurance-training volume and lower body-fat percentage. These findings support an endurance-prioritized model, while still recognizing that the stations create meaningful anaerobic and neuromuscular constraints.

The main limitation is generalizability. The Brandt et al. sample was small, recreational and predominantly male, and the competition was simulated rather than performed in a live race environment. The study therefore should not be used to claim definitive elite female predictors. It does, however, provide direct support for a central coaching principle: HYROX performance is likely limited by the athlete’s ability to sustain high aerobic output while repeatedly absorbing station-induced local fatigue and returning to efficient running.

Figure 1. Evidence-informed performance model for elite female HYROX athletes. The model treats menstrual and recovery monitoring as individual modifiers of training response rather than universal rules for programming.

Concurrent Training for Female HYROX Athletes

HYROX preparation is a concurrent-training problem. Athletes must develop aerobic capacity and running economy while maintaining enough maximal strength, power, muscular endurance and movement skill to move official station loads efficiently. Female-specific evidence supports the feasibility of this goal. Mikkonen et al. (2024) concluded that concurrent strength and endurance training generally increases parameters associated with maximal strength and endurance capacity in women, while also emphasizing that female athletic samples remain limited and that menstrual status and hormonal contraceptive use are often under-reported.

A broader systematic review and meta-analysis by Huiberts et al. (2024) found that concurrent training produced small interference in lower-body strength adaptations in males, but not clearly in females, with no sex differences observed for upper-body strength, power or VO2max adaptations. This does not mean interference is irrelevant for elite female athletes; rather, it suggests that women should not be steered away from serious concurrent preparation on the assumption that strength and endurance cannot be developed together.

The most actionable caution concerns explosive strength. Schumann et al. (2022) reported that concurrent aerobic and strength training does not appear to compromise maximal strength or hypertrophy overall, but explosive-strength gains may be attenuated, particularly when aerobic and strength training are performed in the same session. HYROX is not a pure power sport, yet rapid force expression still matters for sled acceleration, burpee rebounding, turn mechanics, wall-ball cycling and repeated re-acceleration into running. Therefore, when performance level allows, demanding lower-body strength or power sessions should be separated from high-intensity run work by several hours or by day. When they must be combined, the highest-priority adaptation of the phase should be performed first.

Endurance Intensity Distribution and Compromised Running

The endurance component of HYROX requires more than accumulating hard mixed-modal intervals. The event duration, running volume and repeated fatigue transitions suggest that athletes need a durable aerobic foundation, threshold control, and the ability to run efficiently after station-specific muscular disruption. A 2025 individual-participant network meta-analysis of endurance athletes found no universal superiority of one training-intensity distribution model, but suggested that competitive athletes may obtain greater VO2max improvements from polarized models, whereas recreational athletes may respond similarly or better to pyramidal distributions (Rosenblat et al., 2025).

For elite female HYROX athletes, the practical implication is not to copy endurance-only periodization, but to avoid the trap of making every session race-like and moderately hard. A defensible model includes substantial low-intensity running or aerobic cross-training, targeted threshold or tempo work, high-intensity intervals when they serve a clear purpose, and specific compromised-running sessions in which 1 km run segments are practiced after sled, carry, lunge, row, SkiErg or wall-ball work. These sessions should be layered progressively rather than used year-round as maximal tests.

Compromised running is especially important because each station changes the athlete’s next run in a different way. Sled push and pull may impair early stride power and breathing rhythm; burpee broad jumps and lunges may affect hip extension and ground contact; farmers carry may alter trunk tone and arm swing; wall balls occur too late to improve subsequent running but strongly test pacing discipline and movement efficiency. Training should therefore expose athletes to run-after-station patterns without allowing simulation fatigue to crowd out foundational adaptation.

Female-Athlete Physiology and Menstrual-Cycle Considerations

Female-specific coaching is essential, but it should be precise rather than prescriptive. The strongest current synthesis of menstrual-cycle phase and exercise performance found that performance may be trivially reduced during the early follicular phase at the group level, but the effect is small, evidence quality is low and universal phase-based prescriptions are not warranted (McNulty et al., 2020). This finding should shift applied language away from rigid claims such as “women should deload in phase X” and toward individualized tracking of symptoms, readiness and performance response.

More recent intervention evidence also supports caution. Kubica et al. (2024) compared polarized running training adapted to menstrual-cycle phases versus training allocated contrary to those phases in naturally menstruating, moderately trained women. Group-level endurance and cardiovascular adaptations were similar. While this does not mean the menstrual cycle is irrelevant, it argues against assuming that phase-based programming is automatically superior to well-designed conventional training.

For elite female HYROX athletes, the most defensible approach is cycle-aware but athlete-specific. Coaches should track menstrual status, hormonal contraceptive use, symptoms, sleep, perceived exertion, thermal tolerance, soreness, energy intake, training outputs and recovery responses over multiple cycles. Adjustments should be made when a pattern is repeated and meaningful for the individual athlete. This approach respects female physiology without turning average group findings into rigid rules that may under-train some athletes and over-medicalize others.

This individualized stance also applies to athletes using hormonal contraception, athletes with irregular or absent menstrual bleeding, perimenopausal athletes and athletes returning from pregnancy or injury. These groups may have distinct monitoring needs, but the core principle remains the same: use prospective data, athlete communication and clinical referral pathways when symptoms suggest endocrine, nutritional or health concerns.

Nutrition, Hydration and REDs Risk Management

HYROX creates a demanding fueling environment because it combines prolonged high-intensity work, repeated station surges and concurrent training preparation. General sport-nutrition position stands emphasize that dietary strategies should support training adaptation, recovery, performance and health through appropriate energy, carbohydrate, protein, fat, micronutrient and fluid intake (Thomas et al., 2016). For HYROX athletes, carbohydrate availability is particularly important because the race includes sustained hard running and repeated glycolytic station efforts.

During longer or high-intensity endurance events, carbohydrate intake recommendations commonly scale with duration and gastrointestinal tolerance; for exercise lasting beyond approximately one hour, exogenous carbohydrate can support performance, with higher intakes requiring practice and individualization (Jeukendrup, 2014). In HYROX, practical race-day fueling must consider start time, gut tolerance, expected race duration, heat, pre-race anxiety and the reality that eating during the event may be limited. Therefore, carbohydrate availability before the race and well-practiced fluid or gel strategies around the start window often matter more than elaborate in-race feeding plans.

Protein intake should support muscle repair and adaptation across the concurrent program. ISSN guidance indicates that high-quality protein doses of approximately 20-40 g, or around 0.25 g/kg per serving, can stimulate muscle protein synthesis in many athletes, while daily intake should be individualized to training load, energy availability and body-composition goals (Jäger et al., 2017). Female-athlete nutrition position stands further emphasize that adequate energy intake and energy availability are foundational, and that nutrition must be interpreted in relation to hormonal status, menstrual health, training stress and recovery (Holtzman & Ackerman, 2021; Sims et al., 2023).

REDs surveillance is a performance issue, not a side note. The 2023 IOC consensus statement defines REDs as a syndrome of impaired physiological and psychological function experienced by female and male athletes exposed to problematic low energy availability, with potential consequences for health and performance (Mountjoy et al., 2023). Female HYROX athletes may be exposed to multiple REDs risk pressures: high training loads, body-composition emphasis, endurance volume, strength-performance goals, competition calendars, social-media comparison and inadequate carbohydrate intake. Screening should include menstrual function, fatigue, illness frequency, injury history, sleep, mood, libido, gastrointestinal patterns, iron status, bone-stress symptoms and persistent performance stagnation.

Pacing, Station Skill and Injury Surveillance

Pacing is likely one of the most important HYROX-specific skills. Official preparation materials warn athletes not to start too fast and to prepare for running after fatigue-inducing stations (HYROX World GmbH, n.d.-b). Brandt et al. (2025) further show that the highest physiological and perceptual values occurred late in the simulated event, particularly around wall balls. Together, these data support a practical hypothesis: successful athletes protect early running rhythm, avoid unnecessary glycolytic spikes, preserve station mechanics and minimize late-race degradation rather than simply maximizing early split speed.

Station skill should be treated as economy training. In elite fields, the fastest athletes are not only stronger or fitter; they also lose less time to set-up errors, inefficient turns, no-reps, poor breathing rhythm, excess grip tension, unnecessary rest breaks and slow transitions. Technical economy should be trained under both fresh and fatigued conditions. However, fatigue-based skill work should be introduced progressively because degraded movement quality can increase tissue stress and impair learning.

The peer-reviewed literature does not yet provide a robust injury-incidence model for elite female HYROX athletes. The event includes running volume, loaded sled work, repeated jumping and burpees, rowing, carrying, lunging and overhead throwing under fatigue, so plausible risk areas include the foot and ankle, Achilles tendon, knee, hip, lumbar spine, shoulder and hand or forearm. These are evidence-informed hypotheses, not established HYROX-specific epidemiology. Coaches should therefore avoid overstating injury claims and instead implement systematic surveillance: pain logs, training-load progression, footwear and surface review, technique checks, recovery markers, menstrual and energy-availability screening, and timely referral to qualified medical professionals.

Table 2. Key evidence sources and coaching interpretation

Practical Programming Framework

A publication-ready coaching framework should distinguish between principles that are strongly evidence-supported and details that require individualization. The strongest principles are: develop aerobic capacity and running economy; maintain progressive heavy resistance training; protect power and explosive qualities through intelligent sequencing; practice station efficiency and transitions; fuel adequately; and monitor health markers continuously. The more individualized details include exact menstrual-cycle adjustments, carbohydrate dosing, weekly training distribution, simulation frequency, taper length and station-specific technical priorities.

Figure 2 provides one example of how these principles can be organized across a 16-week preparation block. It is not intended as a universal plan. Elite athletes with deeper training histories, heavy competition calendars or specific weaknesses may need different phase lengths. The key idea is sequencing: first build capacity and movement quality, then layer threshold and strength-power development, then increase race-specific compromised-running density, then sharpen and taper without abandoning health monitoring.

Figure 2. Example 16-week concurrent-training logic for HYROX preparation. The timeline emphasizes sequencing and monitoring rather than a rigid template.

Table 3. Example 16-week training phase logic for elite female HYROX preparation

Practical Implications

• Program HYROX as a running-focused hybrid endurance event rather than a random mixed-modal conditioning test.
• Use concurrent training confidently in female athletes, but protect key strength-power sessions from unnecessary interference.
• Practice compromised running after specific station stressors, especially sleds, lunges, carries and wall-ball fatigue, while preserving enough easy aerobic work to drive adaptation.
• Treat menstrual-cycle data as individual monitoring information, not a universal calendar for high and low training days.
• Prioritize energy availability, carbohydrate sufficiency, protein distribution, iron and vitamin D awareness, hydration and REDs screening as core performance infrastructure.
• Track station splits, run splits, transition time, no-reps, rest breaks and perceived exertion; these data are more useful than total race time alone.
• State openly when recommendations are extrapolated from adjacent literature rather than proven in elite female HYROX cohorts.

Limitations

This review has several limitations. First, it is a narrative review and does not use systematic search, screening or risk-of-bias procedures. Second, direct HYROX-specific evidence is still limited, and the strongest current HYROX study used a small recreational sample with limited female representation. Third, most female-specific conclusions are drawn from adjacent literatures, especially concurrent training, endurance training, menstrual-cycle research, sports nutrition and REDs. Fourth, elite female HYROX performance may be influenced by variables not adequately covered in current literature, including competition density, travel stress, footwear and surface effects, pregnancy and postpartum status, perimenopause, hormone therapy, psychological skill and socioeconomic access to specialized equipment.

These limitations do not weaken the practical value of the review; they clarify the level of certainty. The manuscript should be read as a defensible applied synthesis for coaches and practitioners, not as proof of causal HYROX-specific predictors in elite women.

Future Research

The highest-priority research need is a prospective, female-focused HYROX cohort. A strong design would follow competitive women across a 12- to 16-week preparation phase and one or more official races. Minimum variables should include official run splits, station splits and transition times; training-load distribution; menstrual status; hormonal-contraceptive use; symptom tracking; dietary intake or energy-availability proxies; ferritin, hemoglobin and vitamin D status where clinically appropriate; VO2max or ventilatory threshold; maximal and relative lower-body strength; grip endurance; power or jump measures; and injury or illness events.

Analytically, future studies should move beyond total finish time. Split decomposition could identify whether female performance is more strongly constrained by run degradation, sled work, grip-limited stations, lunges, wall balls or transition behavior. Mixed-effects models could account for repeated races and athlete-level variability. Cluster analysis could identify pacing archetypes. Sensitivity analyses by menstrual status, hormonal contraceptive use, REDs risk and training history would help move the field from generic female-athlete advice toward precision coaching.

Conclusion

Elite female HYROX performance is best understood as the integrated outcome of aerobic capacity, running economy under fatigue, station-specific efficiency, fatigue-resistant strength, grip and trunk durability, pacing discipline, sufficient fueling and individualized recovery monitoring. The direct HYROX evidence now available supports an endurance-prioritized model, but elite female-specific data remain scarce. Female athletes should not be protected from hard concurrent training by assumption; instead, they should be supported with intelligent sequencing, adequate nutrition, symptom-informed monitoring and health surveillance.

The most scientifically defensible coaching message is both ambitious and conservative: train elite women hard and specifically, but do not overstate evidence where HYROX-specific data are absent. Build the aerobic engine, keep the strength ceiling high, rehearse the race’s compromised-running demands, protect explosive qualities, fuel the work, monitor the athlete and individualize adjustments when real patterns emerge.

References

Brandt, T., Ebel, C., Lebahn, C., & Schmidt, A. (2025). Acute physiological responses and performance determinants in HYROX - a new running-focused high intensity functional fitness trend. Frontiers in Physiology, 16, Article 1519240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1519240

Holtzman, B., & Ackerman, K. E. (2021). Recommendations and nutritional considerations for female athletes: Health and performance. Sports Medicine, 51(Suppl 1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01508-8

Huiberts, R. O., Wust, R. C. I., & van der Zwaard, S. (2024). Concurrent strength and endurance training: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of sex and training status. Sports Medicine, 54, 485-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01943-9

HYROX World GmbH. (2026). HYROX EN single rulebook 26/27. https://maintain.hyrox.com/rulebooks/HYROX_RulebookSingles_EN.pdf

HYROX World GmbH. (n.d.-a). The fitness race. Retrieved July 6, 2026, from https://hyrox.com/the-fitness-race/

HYROX World GmbH. (n.d.-b). Best HYROX preparation. Retrieved July 6, 2026, from https://hyrox.com/best-hyrox-preparation/

Jager, R., Kerksick, C. M., Campbell, B. I., Cribb, P. J., Wells, S. D., Skwiat, T. M., Purpura, M., Ziegenfuss, T. N., Ferrando, A. A., Arent, S. M., Smith-Ryan, A. E., Stout, J. R., Arciero, P. J., Ormsbee, M. J., Taylor, L. W., Wilborn, C. D., Kalman, D. S., Kreider, R. B., Willoughby, D. S., Hoffman, J. R., ... Antonio, J. (2017). International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Protein and exercise. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-017-0177-8

Jeukendrup, A. (2014). A step towards personalized sports nutrition: Carbohydrate intake during exercise. Sports Medicine, 44(Suppl 1), S25-S33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0148-z

Kubica, C., Ketelhut, S., & Nigg, C. R. (2024). Polarized running training adapted to versus contrary to the menstrual cycle phases has similar effects on endurance performance and cardiovascular parameters. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 124, 3433-3444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05545-9

McNulty, K. L., Elliott-Sale, K. J., Dolan, E., Swinton, P. A., Ansdell, P., Goodall, S., Thomas, K., & Hicks, K. M. (2020). The effects of menstrual cycle phase on exercise performance in eumenorrheic women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 50, 1813-1827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-020-01319-3

Mikkonen, R. S., Ihalainen, J. K., Hackney, A. C., & Hakkinen, K. (2024). Perspectives on concurrent strength and endurance training in healthy adult females: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 54, 673-696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01955-5

Mountjoy, M., Ackerman, K. E., Bailey, D. M., Burke, L. M., Constantini, N., Hackney, A. C., Heikura, I. A., Melin, A., Pensgaard, A. M., Stellingwerff, T., Sundgot-Borgen, J. K., Torstveit, M. K., Jacobsen, A. U., Verhagen, E., Budgett, R., Engebretsen, L., & Erdener, U. (2023). 2023 International Olympic Committee's consensus statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport (REDs). British Journal of Sports Medicine, 57(17), 1073-1097. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2023-106994

Rosenblat, M. A., Watt, J. A., Arnold, J. I., Treff, G., Sandbakk, O. B., Esteve-Lanao, J., Festa, L., Filipas, L., Galloway, S. D., Munoz, I., Ramos-Campo, D. J., Schneeweiss, P., Selles-Perez, S., Stoggl, T., Talsnes, R. K., Zinner, C., Seiler, S., & others. (2025). Which training intensity distribution intervention will produce the greatest improvements in maximal oxygen uptake and time-trial performance in endurance athletes? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of individual participant data. Sports Medicine, 55, 655-673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02149-3

Schumann, M., Feuerbacher, J. F., Sunkeler, M., Freitag, N., Ronnestad, B. R., Doma, K., & Lundberg, T. R. (2022). Compatibility of concurrent aerobic and strength training for skeletal muscle size and function: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 52, 601-612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01587-7

Sims, S. T., Kerksick, C. M., Smith-Ryan, A. E., Janse de Jonge, X. A. K., Hirsch, K. R., Arent, S. M., Hewlings, S. J., Kleiner, S. M., Bustillo, E., Tartar, J. L., Starratt, V. G., Kreider, R. B., Greenwalt, C., Renteria, L. I., Ormsbee, M. J., VanDusseldorp, T. A., Campbell, B. I., Kalman, D. S., & Antonio, J. (2023). International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: Nutritional concerns of the female athlete. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 20(1), Article 2204066. https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2023.2204066

Thomas, D. T., Erdman, K. A., & Burke, L. M. (2016). Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: Nutrition and athletic performance. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 116(3), 501-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.12.006